William Shatner, who played Captain Kirk in Star Trek: The Original Series and various film spinoffs, responded to Stephen Miller’s plan to save Star Trek.
Here's my take on why Paramount is leaving comments open and also showing the total view count - David Ellison wants this show to be mocked and to fail so that he has a clear path to getting rid of Kurtzman and also justification for bringing on capable people who can restore the franchise. This is all calculated.
Reread my comment. Paramount can then course correct and get Star Trek back to what it should be, and if the LGBTQPBLMTARD community complains, he can say "Look, we gave Alex a lot of money and he delivered a bomb that no one watched. It's clearly not working."
Please read my comment. I said that he could do all that at any time. That is, I disagreed with: “ David Ellison wants this show to be mocked and to fail…”
He controls the company and can fire Kurtzman without waiting for another failure. Hollywood history is filled with far more capricious firings.
Hilarious idea. But in the real world, actors and actresses often have little feel for their shows. Worse, acting and running a show are different skills. A few can do both, but they are very rare.
Plus, we've seen what Star Trek looks like when Shatner has creative control. V was atrocious; his novels have been better, but the ones I read were still overly Kirk-centric and over-the-top.
I don't know if I would call it atrocious, practically anything that could go wrong did go wrong.
I think something fairly solid was originally there, but between the monster Hollywood strike going on during production, the special effects studio screwing up the mountain climbing "fall" scene, and producer/studio kneebreaker Harve Bennett meddling wherever he could (the movie was cut down for "reasons"), I think there is a better movie hiding behind what was eventually tossed at the public, with V the first failure in the TOS movie series, regardless of the Crater Lake sized series of plot holes in "Wrath of Khan" (the "12 day wonder" script).
The most creative character was the fat black retard with afro-puffs, who is a hologram "with the brain of a 4-year-old." Must be no Future Ozempic because half the crew are fatasses. Shitner's retarded tweet was ST V's sequel.
Here's my take on why Paramount is leaving comments open and also showing the total view count - David Ellison wants this show to be mocked and to fail so that he has a clear path to getting rid of Kurtzman and also justification for bringing on capable people who can restore the franchise. This is all calculated.
David Ellison needs no excuse to fire anyone he wants to fire. He may have to payout their contracts, but that’s commonplace in Hollywood.
Reread my comment. Paramount can then course correct and get Star Trek back to what it should be, and if the LGBTQPBLMTARD community complains, he can say "Look, we gave Alex a lot of money and he delivered a bomb that no one watched. It's clearly not working."
Please read my comment. I said that he could do all that at any time. That is, I disagreed with: “ David Ellison wants this show to be mocked and to fail…”
He controls the company and can fire Kurtzman without waiting for another failure. Hollywood history is filled with far more capricious firings.
Hilarious idea. But in the real world, actors and actresses often have little feel for their shows. Worse, acting and running a show are different skills. A few can do both, but they are very rare.
Plus, we've seen what Star Trek looks like when Shatner has creative control. V was atrocious; his novels have been better, but the ones I read were still overly Kirk-centric and over-the-top.
I don't know if I would call it atrocious, practically anything that could go wrong did go wrong.
I think something fairly solid was originally there, but between the monster Hollywood strike going on during production, the special effects studio screwing up the mountain climbing "fall" scene, and producer/studio kneebreaker Harve Bennett meddling wherever he could (the movie was cut down for "reasons"), I think there is a better movie hiding behind what was eventually tossed at the public, with V the first failure in the TOS movie series, regardless of the Crater Lake sized series of plot holes in "Wrath of Khan" (the "12 day wonder" script).
Also Shatner is in his 90s
Exactly. He’s older than biden.
The most creative character was the fat black retard with afro-puffs, who is a hologram "with the brain of a 4-year-old." Must be no Future Ozempic because half the crew are fatasses. Shitner's retarded tweet was ST V's sequel.
Shatner's right.
Speaking of: Why didn't you put a picture of him on the article, instead of the female Jemhadar?
I think Shatner is too smart. He would be a public face and not the final decision, and even he knows it.
No, the only way to save Trek is to take it away from Paramount and everyone currently associated with it.
Or just let the strange new worlds team start running all the shows instead of just one
Give back those Starfleet Admiral pips to Mr Shatner.