Ian McKellen gave an interview to The Guardian last week and, in passing, confirmed something the current generation of political celebrities has spent decades arguing against.
They made the celebrities. Thats why they push them. Weak minded, weak willed broken people from broken families desperate for attention are "redeemed" by selling their souls for fame, fortune and immortality to the elites but instead are sexually abused, used, chewed up and spat out. Cycle repeats.
Sir Alec Guinness was a class act. He was correct in advising his fellow entertainers to keep their fat yaps shut and just perform. Tis a darn shame so few of them understand his message.
CIA saved his Commie Dad from Chile's Pinochet. His dad is a "fertility" expert aka Pervert and Pedo experimenting and preying upon unsuspecting women seeking medical treatment leading too Rape, Child Rape, Abortion (Organ Harvesting) and Transing Kids from early age.
Mr. Guinness is not wrong about what he said, I mean if actors/actresses, celebs are wanting to advocate then they should run for office or pursue an actual job advocating those sort of things rather then become entertainers...I mean whole point of being an entertainer is simply that...to entertain and there is nothing entertaining about actors/actresses, celebs, etc. getting up on platforms or online spewing all the hate and political nonsense like many do. Entertainers are there to entertain audiences not promote agendas or movements and such like many have and do.
I just wish people were able to compartmentalize their feelings about the politics and the art of an artist.
For instance, I'm a Commie Pinko Red, and while I am a fan of Paul Robeson as an actor, singer and activist, I am also a fan of the on-screen work of John Wayne and his even more rabidly anti-Communist buddy, Ward Bond. There are obscure character actors from the Hollywood Golden Age whom I respect for their acting but not their politics (e.g., Lucille Watson from 1939's "The Women") and others whom I respect for both their acting and their politics, pro-labor (the four gentlemen who founded the Screen Actors Guild, for instance) or otherwise.
There comes a point, however, where I have no problem with a performer NOT pandering to the audience, even if they don't want to hear a "prematurely anti-Nazi or anti-Fascist" message, like in the 1930's, or a message about police brutality (see Colin Kaepernick and all of the snowflakes who went nuts over his taking a knee during the national anthem). And those kinds of positions are no more political than the pro-American or anti-abortion or pro-capitalism positions that the Right never seems to resent an actor, artist or writer taking.
Now, I just got a S.M. Stirling (libertarian) novel in, and am anxiously awaiting the publication (by Baen, crossing my fingers) of the sequel to the recent Roman Empire time travel novel by Tom Kratman (Would gratuitously anti-gay reactionary be an apt description?), so I'll take my leave.
By the way, Jon, I appreciated your video obituary for Eric Flint from four years ago.
I wonder how much you need to have the right (or more appropriately left) views, and say them out loud to audiences, to get jobs in Hollywood these days. The actors might well be worried about their careers individually, even if collectively it's bad for the industry as a whole.
CIA/Mossad pushing "celebrities" to make anti-American propaganda statements is a self-defeating cycle of loss circling the toilet bowl...
Q said: "They thought you would follow the celebrities."
Why? Because the globalists who hate you also think you're stupid.
They made the celebrities. Thats why they push them. Weak minded, weak willed broken people from broken families desperate for attention are "redeemed" by selling their souls for fame, fortune and immortality to the elites but instead are sexually abused, used, chewed up and spat out. Cycle repeats.
Sir Alec Guinness was a class act. He was correct in advising his fellow entertainers to keep their fat yaps shut and just perform. Tis a darn shame so few of them understand his message.
Pedo Pisspal is Dim Djerkoff.
CIA saved his Commie Dad from Chile's Pinochet. His dad is a "fertility" expert aka Pervert and Pedo experimenting and preying upon unsuspecting women seeking medical treatment leading too Rape, Child Rape, Abortion (Organ Harvesting) and Transing Kids from early age.
Pedro Pascal is the cancer.
His whole Family are Commies. CIA saved them from Pinochet. They should've been up against a wall.
Mr. Guinness is not wrong about what he said, I mean if actors/actresses, celebs are wanting to advocate then they should run for office or pursue an actual job advocating those sort of things rather then become entertainers...I mean whole point of being an entertainer is simply that...to entertain and there is nothing entertaining about actors/actresses, celebs, etc. getting up on platforms or online spewing all the hate and political nonsense like many do. Entertainers are there to entertain audiences not promote agendas or movements and such like many have and do.
I just wish people were able to compartmentalize their feelings about the politics and the art of an artist.
For instance, I'm a Commie Pinko Red, and while I am a fan of Paul Robeson as an actor, singer and activist, I am also a fan of the on-screen work of John Wayne and his even more rabidly anti-Communist buddy, Ward Bond. There are obscure character actors from the Hollywood Golden Age whom I respect for their acting but not their politics (e.g., Lucille Watson from 1939's "The Women") and others whom I respect for both their acting and their politics, pro-labor (the four gentlemen who founded the Screen Actors Guild, for instance) or otherwise.
There comes a point, however, where I have no problem with a performer NOT pandering to the audience, even if they don't want to hear a "prematurely anti-Nazi or anti-Fascist" message, like in the 1930's, or a message about police brutality (see Colin Kaepernick and all of the snowflakes who went nuts over his taking a knee during the national anthem). And those kinds of positions are no more political than the pro-American or anti-abortion or pro-capitalism positions that the Right never seems to resent an actor, artist or writer taking.
Now, I just got a S.M. Stirling (libertarian) novel in, and am anxiously awaiting the publication (by Baen, crossing my fingers) of the sequel to the recent Roman Empire time travel novel by Tom Kratman (Would gratuitously anti-gay reactionary be an apt description?), so I'll take my leave.
By the way, Jon, I appreciated your video obituary for Eric Flint from four years ago.
I wonder how much you need to have the right (or more appropriately left) views, and say them out loud to audiences, to get jobs in Hollywood these days. The actors might well be worried about their careers individually, even if collectively it's bad for the industry as a whole.