If you thought Starfleet Academy couldn’t possibly get worse, Episode 3 went full-tilt into woke concepts that demonstrate how insufferable the writers intend this show to be.
What’s the dead pool number for the age when these three off themselves. Will the fag klingon make it to thirty? What about “rough and tough, with her Afro puffs”? Any of ‘em making it to old age?
What I love about what you said is the simple numbers.
Out of all of the “big” mid-west cities, I live in one of the smallest. Yet we have 500k in population.
My city has 325k more than watched star wreck. What about the multi millions in nyc, chicago, philly, la, houston, San Antonio, mexico, dallas, charlotte,……?
One
Hundred
Seventy
Five thousand.
Yeah. trek has “healthy” fan base, nowadays.
Are the black chicks they’re pandering to, watching?
Nah. Them 70 iq primates are watching jerry springer and shit.
That’s missing the point. The premier episode was #7 on the Paramount app. Episode 3 scored even higher, #5 on the app - showing a growing audience. Also, different sources report very different ratings on both Paramount and other platforms:
Nielsen and Luminate will eventually have numbers such as total minutes watched. Ignore sites that give analogs for actual viewer minutes watched. Neilsen will take 7-10 days before you see numbers, while Luminate will compile once a week (Thursdays, I believe.)
The numbers will be interesting to see. Critics of woke shows say they are unpopular, yet most run for 2 - 3 seasons. Some far longer. If the critics are correct, why can streamers raise prices while subscriber counts remain fat or increase? Something does not match.
Don’t assume these are actually businesses whose concerns are making a profit. You have to assume they are propaganda organs first and foremost. ESG funding props up many of them, so they are insulated from many normal economic realities, such as turning a profit.
Most of these are public corporations, with audited books. For example, look at Netflix’s rising subscribers’ fee, rising subscribers’ count, and rising profits. And they are quite woke.
What’s the dead pool number for the age when these three off themselves. Will the fag klingon make it to thirty? What about “rough and tough, with her Afro puffs”? Any of ‘em making it to old age?
Those three look like the most uppity, and worthless, antagonistic, victims of the the brown universit class of ‘26. Yay.
If they don’t do the “6-7” meme by the end of the season I will be mad.
That’s the height of lonzo ball. A sucky basketball player with one suckiest human beings, ever, for a pops
Why does that black girl's face fill me with rage?
Because. Every black chick’s face is a stiff lipped angry, “untouchable” since the late 90’s. The paradigm for this is alfre woodard.
And yet, when she smiles, I get even angrier!!!
What does #5 on the Paramount app translate into numbers of people watching?
The YouTube video of Episode 1 pulled about 175K views over a full week.
Critical Drinker's episode mocking it live had 200K to 400K in three hours.
As they say in textbooks, "the remaining proof is left to the reader."
What I love about what you said is the simple numbers.
Out of all of the “big” mid-west cities, I live in one of the smallest. Yet we have 500k in population.
My city has 325k more than watched star wreck. What about the multi millions in nyc, chicago, philly, la, houston, San Antonio, mexico, dallas, charlotte,……?
One
Hundred
Seventy
Five thousand.
Yeah. trek has “healthy” fan base, nowadays.
Are the black chicks they’re pandering to, watching?
Nah. Them 70 iq primates are watching jerry springer and shit.
And those 70 IQ primates are gluing nylon clothesline to their heads.
How many people knew about the YouTube broadcast? How strongly did YouTube’s algorithm promote it?
That’s missing the point. The premier episode was #7 on the Paramount app. Episode 3 scored even higher, #5 on the app - showing a growing audience. Also, different sources report very different ratings on both Paramount and other platforms:
https://www.cbr.com/star-trek-starfleet-academy-losing-steam-paramount-streaming-january-2025/
But the premier bombed on YouTube. Rotten Tomatoes has the show it at 43% on the audience’s metric.
How to reconcile these divergent numbers? We live in the Empire of Lies, where nothing is what it seems to be.
Nielsen and Luminate will eventually have numbers such as total minutes watched. Ignore sites that give analogs for actual viewer minutes watched. Neilsen will take 7-10 days before you see numbers, while Luminate will compile once a week (Thursdays, I believe.)
The numbers will be interesting to see. Critics of woke shows say they are unpopular, yet most run for 2 - 3 seasons. Some far longer. If the critics are correct, why can streamers raise prices while subscriber counts remain fat or increase? Something does not match.
Don’t assume these are actually businesses whose concerns are making a profit. You have to assume they are propaganda organs first and foremost. ESG funding props up many of them, so they are insulated from many normal economic realities, such as turning a profit.
Most of these are public corporations, with audited books. For example, look at Netflix’s rising subscribers’ fee, rising subscribers’ count, and rising profits. And they are quite woke.