Gaiman can try and make all kinds of excuses, but some of the victims accounts are too graphic and detailed to be fabricated; things people wouldn't think to describe unless they actually happened...
Did you read last year's VULTURE article? I doubt those kinds of descriptions would be in a "romance novel"...
I'm not saying all the women may be completely blameless, but there appears to be enough consistency to establish a pattern of behavior-- talented writer that's also a closet pervert...
No one is blaming women. To lack any evidence and claim something is too detailed and graphic to be fake, is weak "evidence". This is how you get believe all women propaganda.
Another example of an "artist" who should possess the intelligence/sophistication for seduction, or at the very least afford consensual talent away from his family life. Nah, just another d-bag.
Gaiman still hasn't been canceled in any serious way. His X account is still up and running. He hasn't yet had to flee beyond the reach of Western court systems.
He probably thought it was worth testing the comeback waters. It wasn't but scientology doesn't foster the firmest of grips on reality.
When he gets really desperate he'll likely return to the First Church of El-Ron.
Dude, he was raised as one. His father was high up in the "Church". He claims he isn't and likely that's true because he would have have a lot of proxy-defenders from the "church" speaking up for him. He might still go back but they will insist on taking full control of him. And horrible as it is to admit -- It's not a bad idea in his case.
Feel sorry for these leftoids. Their side doesn't believe in forgiveness, so Neil can't make restitution and say he's changed. He must forever claim he did nothing wrong or the people on his side will destroy him. Granted, he could also leave them and find Jesus.
It's always the "male feminists" who are the most unsettling. Most of them are creepy weirdo losers hoping to score good boy points and a few leftover crumbs of sexual attention from the table.
Far worse though are the predators like Gaiman. If they are not social pariahs and actually have something women want: money, fame, influence, good looks, they use "male feminist" as both a Trojan Horse to worm their way into compromising situations with women and as a cloak to protect them from criticism and consequence.
With Gaiman, we can clearly see both of those uses in play.
A truly sick, detestable, and unrepentant person to be ostracized for the good of society. For once, cancel culture has the right idea.
The accusations from these women are all identical.
They’re all grown women who enthusiastically took part in having sex with a famous author and associating with his celeb wife. Until YEARS later figuring out that… Actually they were FORCED and PRESSURED! “uwu ahm just a small wiggle gurl without agency!”
They’re all degenerates, and the only thing Gaiman is guilty of, is sticking his dick into crazy BPD chicks who decided to try and destroy him once they weren’t happy with the parameters of their relationship.
IMHO, Neil Gaiman’s personal life should not be a reflection on his body of work nor should there be an active witchhunt to shame said work out of existence. This idea that he and others should be cancelled and made to be examples of in the court of public opinion without a trial or without having an opportunity to speak on behalf of himself is exactly what is wrong with modern world of arm chair internet critics. The work made is not a mockery nor a glorification of behavior he was accused of doing, so why is the work damned? His personal life is his personal business; if there is wrongdoing the police and the courts will take care of it, and that should be the end of it. I pass no judgement on how the man chose to handle things in his personal life because it isn’t my fucking business.
The same thing happened with Justin Roiland, which has all but destroyed Rick and Morty and the subsequent farce of Solar Opposites. Same thing happened to Johnny Depp. He’s been acquitted and still was removed from Pirates of the Caribbean. Look what happened to Johnathan Majors. Removed from the Disney MCU and of recent the Creed films, and he too was proven innocent.
He's clearly guilty. He has all the personal characteristics of someone into BDSM: successful in Hollywood, creepy male feminist, hates God (deviants always hate their Creator), dedicates his life work to undermining/mocking faith in God and promoting hedonism.
I don't know what evidence they have, and I'm sure you're right about him hating God, but that doesn't prove he's guilty of anything specifically illegal either.
The entire comic con scene in the 1990’s before Hollywood invested was a secret pervert playground -and half the men associated with DC Vertigo singing books there were in on it. So was Wizard editor in chief Gareb Shamus.
Neil’s constant retelling of Alice in wonderland.
Now that Disney got to the kids -it’s an open pervert playground.
Gaiman can try and make all kinds of excuses, but some of the victims accounts are too graphic and detailed to be fabricated; things people wouldn't think to describe unless they actually happened...
Lol! Tell me you don’t get out much, without telling me you don’t get out much.
Have you ever read “romance novels”?!
You’d be surprised at the kind of degeneracy a horny woman can come with. Or consume.
Did you read last year's VULTURE article? I doubt those kinds of descriptions would be in a "romance novel"...
I'm not saying all the women may be completely blameless, but there appears to be enough consistency to establish a pattern of behavior-- talented writer that's also a closet pervert...
Of course you are in the comments blaming women.
No one is blaming women. To lack any evidence and claim something is too detailed and graphic to be fake, is weak "evidence". This is how you get believe all women propaganda.
Not saying it's evidence, just that Gaiman definitely sounds like he's got a twisted streak...
I agree with you. All these Hollyweirdos are scum
Another example of an "artist" who should possess the intelligence/sophistication for seduction, or at the very least afford consensual talent away from his family life. Nah, just another d-bag.
Gaiman still hasn't been canceled in any serious way. His X account is still up and running. He hasn't yet had to flee beyond the reach of Western court systems.
He probably thought it was worth testing the comeback waters. It wasn't but scientology doesn't foster the firmest of grips on reality.
When he gets really desperate he'll likely return to the First Church of El-Ron.
Wait, he's a scientologist?
Dude, he was raised as one. His father was high up in the "Church". He claims he isn't and likely that's true because he would have have a lot of proxy-defenders from the "church" speaking up for him. He might still go back but they will insist on taking full control of him. And horrible as it is to admit -- It's not a bad idea in his case.
I don’t really care for Gaiman, but the accusations against him have been pretty dubious to say the least.
The woman he “forced” to have sex in return for letting her stay there, is for example quite wealthy and with numerous wealthy, celebrity friends.
The notion that she didn’t have any other options is ridiculous.
Now I don’t doubt that Gaiman is a degenerate, but so are the women accusing him.
It’s your bitch basic: “Sex with hot BPD chick” gone wrong.
Feel sorry for these leftoids. Their side doesn't believe in forgiveness, so Neil can't make restitution and say he's changed. He must forever claim he did nothing wrong or the people on his side will destroy him. Granted, he could also leave them and find Jesus.
Let the idiot burn in the fires of his Leftism and Feminism.
It's always the "male feminists" who are the most unsettling. Most of them are creepy weirdo losers hoping to score good boy points and a few leftover crumbs of sexual attention from the table.
Far worse though are the predators like Gaiman. If they are not social pariahs and actually have something women want: money, fame, influence, good looks, they use "male feminist" as both a Trojan Horse to worm their way into compromising situations with women and as a cloak to protect them from criticism and consequence.
With Gaiman, we can clearly see both of those uses in play.
A truly sick, detestable, and unrepentant person to be ostracized for the good of society. For once, cancel culture has the right idea.
Oh please.
The accusations from these women are all identical.
They’re all grown women who enthusiastically took part in having sex with a famous author and associating with his celeb wife. Until YEARS later figuring out that… Actually they were FORCED and PRESSURED! “uwu ahm just a small wiggle gurl without agency!”
They’re all degenerates, and the only thing Gaiman is guilty of, is sticking his dick into crazy BPD chicks who decided to try and destroy him once they weren’t happy with the parameters of their relationship.
OK, Neil.
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂☠️🪦
IMHO, Neil Gaiman’s personal life should not be a reflection on his body of work nor should there be an active witchhunt to shame said work out of existence. This idea that he and others should be cancelled and made to be examples of in the court of public opinion without a trial or without having an opportunity to speak on behalf of himself is exactly what is wrong with modern world of arm chair internet critics. The work made is not a mockery nor a glorification of behavior he was accused of doing, so why is the work damned? His personal life is his personal business; if there is wrongdoing the police and the courts will take care of it, and that should be the end of it. I pass no judgement on how the man chose to handle things in his personal life because it isn’t my fucking business.
The same thing happened with Justin Roiland, which has all but destroyed Rick and Morty and the subsequent farce of Solar Opposites. Same thing happened to Johnny Depp. He’s been acquitted and still was removed from Pirates of the Caribbean. Look what happened to Johnathan Majors. Removed from the Disney MCU and of recent the Creed films, and he too was proven innocent.
People just need to mind their fucking business.
He's clearly guilty. He has all the personal characteristics of someone into BDSM: successful in Hollywood, creepy male feminist, hates God (deviants always hate their Creator), dedicates his life work to undermining/mocking faith in God and promoting hedonism.
The only thing he’s guilty of, is sticking his dick in crazy.
After relentless threats and coercion.
I don't know what evidence they have, and I'm sure you're right about him hating God, but that doesn't prove he's guilty of anything specifically illegal either.
The entire comic con scene in the 1990’s before Hollywood invested was a secret pervert playground -and half the men associated with DC Vertigo singing books there were in on it. So was Wizard editor in chief Gareb Shamus.
Neil’s constant retelling of Alice in wonderland.
Now that Disney got to the kids -it’s an open pervert playground.
He better hope he's not in those Epstein files like Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, and the Bidens. Neil is so guilty.