5 Comments
User's avatar
AJ's avatar

"With the rise of AI, one wonders if Chat GPT might be the way to go to conclude this series in a timely manner so fans can get it before they all become too old to care."

Don't f**king say stuff like this. Why should I give a shit about Jon del Arroz, or this author, or anyone else, if we're just going to replace real human authorship with AI?

I don't care if it was meant as a joke (and it's not clear that it was); this isn't something we should be even considering. AI has its place in some fields, but "original" AI art in any form, especially marketed and sold, is anti-human and and anti-intellectual. It's exactly what progressives and leftists have been fighting for, for years. I'd rather have no end to the series than one written by a f**king computer.

AJ's avatar

No, actually. But we're quickly moving to a place where, instead of computers doing the chores so we can make art, the computer will make art while we do the chores. Is that what you want? Because it starts with stuff like this.

James A. Buck's avatar

Hate to nitpick but I would reword the title of your article. It should read: “Daniel Greene just figured out what everyone else has known for at least five years.”