45 Comments
User's avatar
Mr0303's avatar

Looks like another #MeToo fake accusation.

Kindred Spirits' Library's avatar

Why would you say that? What does she get out of this? Just people accusing her of false accusations like this . . . Only about 5% of accusations like this are unfounded and 63% or more don't even get reported. So it is much, much more likely that she is telling the truth than making this up. I am very disappointed. I had really enjoyed his channel and I'm sad to learn he isn't the person I thought he was.

LumberJackAhz's avatar

"Only about 5% of accusations like this are unfounded and 63% or more don't even get reported".

How are "63%" unreported if they are not REPORTED?!?!?!

You just pulled these numbers out of your ass, or you may have gotten them from someone else who pulled them out of their ass.

Also let's not forget that ANYTHING to a Leftard is "Sexual Assault". You could have her on Video agreeing to fůck, and then she claims it was Răpe. Or you could have a Woman drunk grab your face and kiss you out of nowhere at a Bar, and SHE would claim it was "Sexual Assault".

Grow up and realize Women LIE all the time, ESPECIALLY with "Sexual Assault".

V900's avatar

“Only about 5% of accusations are unfounded”

Why yes, let’s bring fake statistics into a fake rape case! Very on point!

Mr0303's avatar

Attention, power, money. Take your pick. If something really happened it should've been reported to the police at the time, not as a publicity stunt years later. The statistics you use are absolute nonsense. How could you possibly know the percentage of unreported cases?

Freya Battlehammer's avatar

Attention, power and money. Where is this money coming from, power? Where from? Attention?? Is it the same attention mentioned above she was already getting in her own social media as an artist? Or just the attention from you dweebs that you imagine she’s searching for?

Mr0303's avatar

Playing the victim invokes sympathy and thus attention. Attention is the currency for social media personalities like her. Look at the case of Amber Heard. Or it could be something as petty as revenge. Glad I could help.

Freya Battlehammer's avatar

That’s a pretty poor choice to use as a comparison. Since it was proven he (Johnny depp) was an abuser. You would have had to have watched the court case and not just the sound bite clips that went viral out of context to know that though.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Feb 12, 2025Edited
Comment deleted
Freya Battlehammer's avatar

Ahh the old “she was asking for it”

Michael K Pate's avatar

I am one of Daniel Greene's subscribers. I'll reserve judgement for now and see where this story goes.

Richard Davis's avatar

I don't know Greene. He may be the wokest woketard in wokedom, but that doesn't make him guilty. This woman has no evidence against him. Her story could be completely fabricated. I'm getting really tired of this "believe women!" nonsense. Women can be every bit as evil, deceptive and manipulative as men. Gaiman actually admitted to the behavior of which he was accused. Let's see what Greene has to say before we condemn him.

DREWIEY's avatar

If Greene is a wokester he wouldn't hesitate if this happened to you. So why give the benefit of the doubt to ppl like him? He wouldn't do it for you.

Richard Davis's avatar

He would not defend me, no. But the presumption of innocence would, if we can preserve it. Western Christian civilization depends very much on this principle. So does the patriarchy, which we should defend, because these woke women want to tear it to the ground, their endless rape accusations being one way to do so. Did you see that tweet the other day on X? A male insurance investigator told how he's been accused over 300 times of sexual harassment (and cleared every time) by women seeking to wriggle out of some fraud they'd gotten mixed up in. It's high time we stopped "believing women."

DREWIEY's avatar

Those who disregard honor and decency forfeit their right to its benefits. This guy is not the male insurance investigator, whom I know nothing about. This guy is a feminist passive aggressive cuck. If people like you keep defending these losers you will lose everything. Not everyone is worth protecting, and definitely not one who scoffs at you in the first place.

Richard Davis's avatar

The real cucks are those who "believe women" without evidence and react emotionally to logical arguments. I am not protecting him, and he is not scoffing at me, for the simple reason that he does not know me, and I do not know him.

DREWIEY's avatar

I wasn't asking you to believe her, I was asking you to not impose your standards on this looser . I looked him up, and he believes all women. This is his thing.

Dan Eveland's avatar

That’s a very good point.

Chris Doyle's avatar

What does woke have to do with anything?

LumberJackAhz's avatar

It's an obvious lie. The Bïtch has Rainbow Hair and isn't hot enough to risk these Allegations.

I'm willing to bet her Channel is dying and she is now using the same lies the #MeToo(PoundMeToo) movement used..........

LumberJackAhz's avatar

How? Do you find Facts "disgusting"?

Rainbow Hair = Leftist

Leftist = Retărd

Retărd = Liar

Liar = Lies

It's not hard to understand unless you are a Retărd as well......

DREWIEY's avatar

Guy looks like a dork too, so at worst you got a 50/50 scenario.

LumberJackAhz's avatar

I'm not saying he WOULD NEVER do it, but he would at least go for an actually hot chick if he tried.

No one would risk Prison by touching a Leftard who looks like Willy Wonkas Toilet......

DREWIEY's avatar

Do you know who Zoey Quinn is bro? Because this is what these guys do. They go for mentally unstable women since it's the only ones that would even tolerate their presence.

Glorp's avatar

He's a woke LGBTQ "male feminist ally" YouTuber, really I'm shocked it's adult women he's doing this to rather than children. I think it's true, if it was fake there wouldn't be stuff like the dumb low-end lawyer mistakes in the C&D, and it all lines up with his own posting. Sending out a C&D over a video you weren't even named in screams guilty. Fake accusations tend to be a lot flimsier.

Steve's avatar

The books he wrote were awful.

Dan Eveland's avatar

As soon as she posted "as a white straight man." she lost all credibility in my eyes. Why even bring that into it?

V900's avatar

I too have been sexually assaulted, but by Naomi King.

No, I don’t feel the need to substantiate this, but I do expect y’all to disavow, boycott her and call her a rapist at any given opportunity.

And yes, money would help. PM me if you want my PayPal so I can heal from rapist Naomi King’s rape of me.

Michael Taylor's avatar

I would have sworn Greene was gay to be quite honest.

Steve's avatar

Daniel Greene… not surprising always found him strange and creepy. Stopped watching him years ago.

Bri<3's avatar

These comments are so disgusting. I'm not knocking Daniel Greene since I only recently heard of him. Yet, how can some of you dismiss a story, an experience so easily without the other party's story? I'm not saying all women haven't lied and claim SA and rape but I do think everyone should be heard, no matter the timeframe. I say this because Naomi mentioned they waited 2 years to tell this story. It's not your judgment to decide when a person can share their experience, if you have ever been a victim of SA and rape, then you would know how hard is it to tell and relive your experience to people who might not even believe you to begin with. Most people who tell their experiences receive nothing in return other than people mostly shaming them for even bringing it up. That's exactly how rapists get away with their actions. Manipulating is real, especially with friends and family because they know how you are and they know your weaknesses, so Naomi believing him when he told them it was only one time and it was a mistake makes sense. You don't know how many people fall into a trap when others can see what it is. Again, this is not saying they aren't lying but how common and easy it is to manipulate someone. And just because you might find them provocative, that doesn't mean "yes" in terms of sex. Until Daniel Greene responds to this allegation and brings forth something that can be considered proof that they are lying, their story and experience should be treated seriously and not bashed on.

V900's avatar

Here’s the thing. Rape accusations aren’t meant to be aired on social media. Even by a rapist like Naomi King.

If she has been sexually assaulted, the correct venue for that is law enforcement and courts.

If you make your SA accusation on social media or YouTube, you’re likely just fishing for clicks.

M. Vienneau's avatar

People like you are the reason more women don't come out with accusations.

If you actually crawled out of your basement and interacted with real people you'd understand why handling these things privately almost never leads to any accountability for the perpetrator. The fact that victims open themselves up to a slew of abuse (as evidenced by this comment section) and force themselves to relive their trauma is enough to mean that accusations like that are usually true. People don't go out of their way to try to bring down successful and powerful men; there's almost nothing to gain, except the faint possibility of justice, and so much to lose. If you think they're just "fishing for clicks" then you're a misogynistic moron and that's just that.

V900's avatar

“Why would they do that!?”

Gee, I dunno. Why are accusations like this proven false over and over?

Bri<3's avatar

Okay, so people of SA and rape should always stay silent, gotcha. Instead of commenting, you should have just waited to hear Daniel's side of the story to see if Naomi was lying. Let's just wait until what Daniel does and say about the situation. You will look very stupid if Naomi's allegations are true. Which will be hilarious for me.

P.S. You would know if you were a victim, law enforcement, and going to court, most of the time, the rapist gets away with it. But I won't be shocked if you believe these people lied as well despite knowing the police and the justice system are messed up.

V900's avatar

Now you’re just being silly.

If they have ACTUALLY been sexually assaulted, they need to go the authorities: Police, who are trained and equipped to deal with it. Not social media.

Sexual assault is too serious a thing to use for clicks and social capital.

Bri<3's avatar

If you watched the video, Naomi stated it was for people to hear, to hopefully stop another accusation from happening and keep people safe, not for clickbait, you're assuming that Naomi is doing this for clickbait. Yes, SA and rape are a serious thing yet law enforcement and the justice system don't take them seriously so people have to look after themselves and help people out like warning people or sharing their experience so another person doesn't have to go through what they went through or maybe they need to share just to move on from the situation. If you can't get this or understand this, you're not a true advocate for SA and rape victims.

Until it is known that Naomi is lying, like I said, their experience and story shouldn't be dismissed.

Mr0303's avatar

"People don't go out of their way to try to bring down successful and powerful men" - LMAO! In what universe are you living in? Powerful men are the exact type that these sort of accusations are meant to destroy. Trump, Biden, Clinton, Johnny Depp, Clarence Thomas, Bill Cosby, Brett Kavanaugh - take your pick.

Katul Riquès's avatar

only one things is certain at this point, one of them has legitimacy to sue the other into effin' oblivion.

Ricardo Guzman Jr's avatar

He always came off as smug and unlikable. Only watched a few of his videos and I've never heard of King, nor have I looked into her "receipts" of SA. Hope all party's get what they deserve if true.

roreadsrandomly's avatar

TYPO ALERT! In the para before the Tumblr Screenshot, you refer to Brian Greene instead of Daniel

Books scrubs's avatar

Pronouns are for attention? Oh wait. Let me guess. Any pronoun other than she/her or he/him, it's for attention. And what does being a singer have anything to do with it. Also, she/they (I don't know which - I wouldn't trust you, but I also wouldn't want to mis-pronoun) were already in Vegas at the time. Daniel went to her/them, they didn't go together. Although, I'm guessing that you only picked apart what you wanted out of the video, if you even watched it at all.