Over the last week, Fantasy News BookTuber Daniel Greene has gone through something incredibly rare, which is to get canceled and then get uncancelled.
Don't care about him, don't know anything about him.
However we all need to agree that it is unacceptable to "Believe All Women" and use the same mentality the Leftărds use.
The Woman shouldn't be Charged with anything since the 1st Amendment means you can openly Lie, but we need to remember her as an Example to use when these people try it on anyone else.
I'm absolutely fascinated by the idea that someone can believe this, assuming you're not trolling, unwell, or an LLM trained exclusively on 18th-century texts that arbitrarily capitalize only some nouns as if they're proper.
Assuming none of those are true, does that mean you believe pergury should not be a crime?
More important follow-up question: why do you use capitalization like you're an 18th-century time traveler?
Either you're forgetting to erroneously capitalize all nouns, as was the style at the time, or you haven't been caught up on what 21st-century English dictates are proper nouns.
To be honest with you, I really only care about that last question. It seems to be a common trait amongst lonely self-educated boys who weep into the void their thoughts on the Constitution like they wrote the fucking thing themselves, which I might be starting to believe is true...
Dude, are you James Madison? Say sike right now.
Anyways, I have no idea what Fandom Pulse is, but Google brought me here from the lands beyond shadow, and I've got to say, this post was pathetic (genuinely saddening). I'm not commenting on the story itself; I'm referring to whatever voice it is that you're writing with. If that's the voice inside your head, please, go back to school or read a book that is preferably outside of the young adult section. It reads like someone hurt you in high school, and it was very ouchie. I'm sorry that happened to you. It's not all bad; Google seems to think you're worth a read right after the three AI-generated articles on the same topic.
Okay, I've had my fun. I'll drop the annoying voice now. You GENTS should get back to whatever think Tanks are LUCKY to have you! Hope you all got a CHUCKLE from this. If you can't laugh at yourself, ah, you know how it goes. If not, I don't really recommend google.
0/10, won't yap again.
Edit: Grammar. Not even the Founding Fathers were perfect, apparently.
You're defending her right to free speech, fair enough. But you don't think she should be prosecuted for defamation? Why not? Surely that would make an Example of her, which is want you want? Right?
You have the right to freedom of speech but you do not have right to be free from the consequences of your actions.
If someone wrongfully slandered you, I'm sure you would seek compensation of some kind. Or would you stick to your principles and defend their right to say anything they want without consequence? Even if they are the most untrue and hurtful things that completely ruin your life? Would you still defend them then?
Don't care about him, don't know anything about him.
However we all need to agree that it is unacceptable to "Believe All Women" and use the same mentality the Leftărds use.
The Woman shouldn't be Charged with anything since the 1st Amendment means you can openly Lie, but we need to remember her as an Example to use when these people try it on anyone else.
The 1st Amendment is an Absolute, and those are UNCONSTITUTIONAL Laws.
No where in the 1st Amendment does it have exceptions, and to promote those Unconstitutional Laws makes you sound like a Leftărd.
You are promoting the Criminals commit Crimes against people you don't like, until the Criminals turn on you.
I'm absolutely fascinated by the idea that someone can believe this, assuming you're not trolling, unwell, or an LLM trained exclusively on 18th-century texts that arbitrarily capitalize only some nouns as if they're proper.
Assuming none of those are true, does that mean you believe pergury should not be a crime?
More important follow-up question: why do you use capitalization like you're an 18th-century time traveler?
Either you're forgetting to erroneously capitalize all nouns, as was the style at the time, or you haven't been caught up on what 21st-century English dictates are proper nouns.
To be honest with you, I really only care about that last question. It seems to be a common trait amongst lonely self-educated boys who weep into the void their thoughts on the Constitution like they wrote the fucking thing themselves, which I might be starting to believe is true...
Dude, are you James Madison? Say sike right now.
Anyways, I have no idea what Fandom Pulse is, but Google brought me here from the lands beyond shadow, and I've got to say, this post was pathetic (genuinely saddening). I'm not commenting on the story itself; I'm referring to whatever voice it is that you're writing with. If that's the voice inside your head, please, go back to school or read a book that is preferably outside of the young adult section. It reads like someone hurt you in high school, and it was very ouchie. I'm sorry that happened to you. It's not all bad; Google seems to think you're worth a read right after the three AI-generated articles on the same topic.
Okay, I've had my fun. I'll drop the annoying voice now. You GENTS should get back to whatever think Tanks are LUCKY to have you! Hope you all got a CHUCKLE from this. If you can't laugh at yourself, ah, you know how it goes. If not, I don't really recommend google.
0/10, won't yap again.
Edit: Grammar. Not even the Founding Fathers were perfect, apparently.
Finally, a man who knows his proper nouns. I can rest easy in Heaven.
Red Herrings don't work on me. Where in the 1st Amendment does it have exceptions?
If is doesn't, then I'm right and you know it.
You lose.
Oh look the NPC had a Malfunction.
Either dispute the facts I said or fūck off.
You're defending her right to free speech, fair enough. But you don't think she should be prosecuted for defamation? Why not? Surely that would make an Example of her, which is want you want? Right?
You have the right to freedom of speech but you do not have right to be free from the consequences of your actions.
If someone wrongfully slandered you, I'm sure you would seek compensation of some kind. Or would you stick to your principles and defend their right to say anything they want without consequence? Even if they are the most untrue and hurtful things that completely ruin your life? Would you still defend them then?
I’m Peter Griffin
I Never heard of any of these people before this. I am not sure why I should care.
Well, Donnie, I'd imagine it's because you're following Fandom Pulse and they want you to care.
Not good enough.