None of the superheroes are anything other than heterosexual. In many cases, they are specifically normal, since they are trying to blend into normal America.
The more they try to make an lgbt+ movie, the less people want to see it.
I dearly miss the time when Actors and actresses did their job and kept their mouths shut. Now every actor and actress is a communist activist first and foremost and couldn't keep their mouths shut if you paid them to do it.
I wasn't sure about this movie when it first hit the trailers, and each time she opens her mouth, the less I want to see it.
"The more they try to make an lgbt+ movie, the less people want to see it."
Because all they have, even for a personality, is their sexuality, and nobody cares, except that we're constantly bombarded by their agitprop, which only increase intolerance.
When we have leaders that aren’t assholes actors can go back to just acting. All of us have a responsibility to give our opinions as we are being outflanked by dickheads.
ANNND the failure of the best-selling man-hating movie of all time is being blamed on bad publicity caused by a few, loud white men.
Funny how just a small handful of men can wreck a femimovie. Must be pretty weak movie... Imagine the power! One or two lone angry white men posting on social media can utterly stop the BILLIONS of social justice warrior lesbians from going to see their favorite movie.
"LGBT under atAAAAAAck!" (insert toxic male eyeroll here)
It always so amusing that "muh repreztayshun!" is so central to any non-white non-male being able to enjoy some content, but then when white men aren't represented, it's somehow a crime that they don't want to spend money on a movie that "isn't made for them!"
What manner of superhero doesn't even wash her hair?
Perhaps the box office prospects would be better if in addition to fighting for truth, justice, and the American Way Supergirl was also fighting for a bottle of shampoo?
Well she makes a salient point about ticking off Christian fathers.
This is what your kid is getting bombarded with at school, on the internet and in gatherings with her social peers. If you don’t ground your kids in reality and morality… this cunt will do it for you.
It used to be that months before the launch of a big film, its leading star had a minder assigned to him that controlled every word he said to the press. Any actor who ran his mouth would have never worked again.
Are they not doing this anymore, or are they OK with what she is saying, even if it will cost them millions of dollars?
People need to stop piling on Alcock. She's just saying everything elite cultural institutions have taught people her age to say. Somebody should have given her a PR briefing before the publicity tour started ... though that would mean the PR people need to know better.
No. At that age, she chose to be a misandrist, a young, cocky, still immature one, but a misandrist nonetheless. And she chose it, because nowadays that's trendy and convenient.
Really saying this? Is she not an adult? Shes 26 YO…If cannot critically think for oneself by that age that’s on her. Haven’t seen some of the stuff she’s said but exactly how is this a neutral bad vs good original Superman type movie? Rather interesting that the original previews were “woke”, anti-normal previews that have now shifted to be the normal good vs evil previews. They’ve seen early numbers. I would’ve seen it before the bad mouthing just like I would’ve seen the Snow White won before the attacks on men from that non-leading “adult” actress. They don’t want everyone’s money so let them take a loss.
I tend to agree with most of your points, but let’s be real. How many people actually critically think? Even people who talk about critically thinking.
Most human beings are wired to get their beliefs handed to them, as is the case with hyper socially dependent animals to learn behavior.
When I met my wife, she was brainwashed completely and hadn’t thought about her beliefs in years. So, I began showing her stats and root cause analysis and teaching her HOW.
She’s an intelligent person, she was just naive about many things and sheltered.
Most kids have been in front of screens for years getting forcefed whatever social engineering drivel got to them first.
This isn’t as asimple as “feminism bad!” or “man bad!” it’s the way our younger generations are being given information and expecting them to not gravitate to the loudest victimhood cause.
Yes, I am saying this. She's an adult, but she is not a PR professional. The publicity rollouts for major movies are carefully stage-managed affairs done by people who *are* PR professionals - or at least they were, and should be.
To leave her out there spouting nonsense is inexcusable. I guarantee you she is not the only actor in Hollywood who believes dumb stuff, but you don't normally hear about it during publicity campaigns. Someone needed to have come to Jesus meeting with her: "You go on Graham Norton, you tell a funny story about the shoot, everyone's happy. Just post pictures of the dog on social media. No politics." That's how it's normally done.
She’s an adult. When is maturity expected? Don’t need to be a PR professional to not “spouting nonsense”. Clearly she isn’t the only actor doing so. Gave you another example. But “nonsense” is opposite common sense. And lacking that as an adult allows for “piling on”.
Disney spent millions on Snow White publicity and “leading” actress was still spouting “nonsense”. They feel they can do so now because no longer worried about repercussions.
Entertainment is a business. It has to make a profit. No one wants to watch movies with queer characters or women heros, in roles that do not reflect reality or biology. That’s why Disney is losing money.
Western Civilization is being dismantled by communists, perverts and Muslims, and if anyone objects they are branded racists or whatever. Or worse, their business or home is burned to the ground or they lose their job or livelihoods.
You most certainly do not. But your viewpoint and artistic preferences are not the norm. Most people are tired of the political correctness, which is now referred to as DEI and ESG.
If a director wants to make theirown vision of a text, changing minor details, Im all for it. I made this point somewhere else yesterday: I Am Legend was turned into a movie because people loved the novel. But when they ran the test screenings, everyone hated the ending. So they went and reshot it. Now everyone likes it.
Writing for screen is a different medium, with a different audience, and often in a different time period. Audiences have different expectations.
You wanna make Spiderman a 40 year old black woman? Have at it. You want Peter Dinklage to play Jack Reacher? Knock yourself out. You want to make the Passion of the Christ using an animated duck as Jesus? Bravo!
All I ask is you make a good story. That's what matters.
Keep me engaged. Get me emotionally invested. Make me care.
The rest of it is irrelevant. Good stories can survive adaptation and alteration. Not just survive, but thrive.
Anyone who doesnt like it should go write, film, direct their own version. Put your own vision into the world. Restore what you think was missing.
But hiding behind online platforms to abuse people and sabotage the work of artists out their trying to create, that is truly fucking pathetic. They are not upholding important values, they are masking bigotry behind ideology.
She has small oddly shaped boobs. That said, I'm surprised they cast a white girl for the role. I was expecting Supergirl to be BLACK and of course, "stunning and brave."
None of the superheroes are anything other than heterosexual. In many cases, they are specifically normal, since they are trying to blend into normal America.
The more they try to make an lgbt+ movie, the less people want to see it.
I dearly miss the time when Actors and actresses did their job and kept their mouths shut. Now every actor and actress is a communist activist first and foremost and couldn't keep their mouths shut if you paid them to do it.
I wasn't sure about this movie when it first hit the trailers, and each time she opens her mouth, the less I want to see it.
"The more they try to make an lgbt+ movie, the less people want to see it."
Because all they have, even for a personality, is their sexuality, and nobody cares, except that we're constantly bombarded by their agitprop, which only increase intolerance.
Oh, you poor fucking victim. Are the homosexuals hurting you again?
No, they're boring me.
"I dearly miss the time when Actors and actresses did their job and kept their mouths shut."
You're not alone. But social media ended that era forever.
When we have leaders that aren’t assholes actors can go back to just acting. All of us have a responsibility to give our opinions as we are being outflanked by dickheads.
Show me on this doll where the Orange Man hurt you.
You’re not worth arguing with. When they come for you don’t ask for my help.
Exactly & it's crept into most of this 💩 nowadays which is why i don't watch any Marvel etc, all ruined by softcock left wing morons 😵💫
Then don’t see the movie, Joe. Nobody gives a fuck.
Ya just don't get it! Supergirl gots to transition! It's where Superman comes from!! 😄
Typical Hollyweird bullshit.
Repellant views aside, it doesn't help anything that she looks like Will Poulter in a wig.
https://x.com/PatrickHMorgan/status/2064796864759603288
The man-hating modern audience will insure this movie is the best selling of all time by at least double previous records.
They will blame the failure on about a dozen fairness-hating MAGAts, of course.
ANNND the failure of the best-selling man-hating movie of all time is being blamed on bad publicity caused by a few, loud white men.
Funny how just a small handful of men can wreck a femimovie. Must be pretty weak movie... Imagine the power! One or two lone angry white men posting on social media can utterly stop the BILLIONS of social justice warrior lesbians from going to see their favorite movie.
"LGBT under atAAAAAAck!" (insert toxic male eyeroll here)
We need to open learing centers for Hollywood actors with special needs like this one.
She looks like a derelict who found the Supergirl suit in a dumpster and put it on.
It almost seems like they made her ugly on purpose. They rebel against “sex sells” and then wonder why the movie bombs.
It always so amusing that "muh repreztayshun!" is so central to any non-white non-male being able to enjoy some content, but then when white men aren't represented, it's somehow a crime that they don't want to spend money on a movie that "isn't made for them!"
What manner of superhero doesn't even wash her hair?
Perhaps the box office prospects would be better if in addition to fighting for truth, justice, and the American Way Supergirl was also fighting for a bottle of shampoo?
Well she makes a salient point about ticking off Christian fathers.
This is what your kid is getting bombarded with at school, on the internet and in gatherings with her social peers. If you don’t ground your kids in reality and morality… this cunt will do it for you.
Fuck off, you ignorant twat.
🖕😂👍
It used to be that months before the launch of a big film, its leading star had a minder assigned to him that controlled every word he said to the press. Any actor who ran his mouth would have never worked again.
Are they not doing this anymore, or are they OK with what she is saying, even if it will cost them millions of dollars?
Disney's Snow Brown answered that one.
You delicate fucking victims! NOTHING is safe for your fragile sensibilities!
You answered your own question at the end there.
I can't wait for AI to fully replace actors and actresses
I get a lot of free cringe thinking about those who still haven’t given up on “superhero” movies. And corporate mass media in general.
Who, in 2026, is so dumb he doesn’t hear about a “Supergirl movie” and immediately KNOW it’s just another advertisement for 3rd-wave feminism?
They’re remaking Supergirl again? Who is this chick and why does anyone care?
Another subhuman entitled dyke with dick envy.
People need to stop piling on Alcock. She's just saying everything elite cultural institutions have taught people her age to say. Somebody should have given her a PR briefing before the publicity tour started ... though that would mean the PR people need to know better.
Bollix. I gear-ron-tee you she's a True Believer in the Party line, and youth is no excuse.
"She'S jUsT a VicTiM gUyZ".
No. At that age, she chose to be a misandrist, a young, cocky, still immature one, but a misandrist nonetheless. And she chose it, because nowadays that's trendy and convenient.
So yeah, no sympathy anymore.
Really saying this? Is she not an adult? Shes 26 YO…If cannot critically think for oneself by that age that’s on her. Haven’t seen some of the stuff she’s said but exactly how is this a neutral bad vs good original Superman type movie? Rather interesting that the original previews were “woke”, anti-normal previews that have now shifted to be the normal good vs evil previews. They’ve seen early numbers. I would’ve seen it before the bad mouthing just like I would’ve seen the Snow White won before the attacks on men from that non-leading “adult” actress. They don’t want everyone’s money so let them take a loss.
I tend to agree with most of your points, but let’s be real. How many people actually critically think? Even people who talk about critically thinking.
Most human beings are wired to get their beliefs handed to them, as is the case with hyper socially dependent animals to learn behavior.
When I met my wife, she was brainwashed completely and hadn’t thought about her beliefs in years. So, I began showing her stats and root cause analysis and teaching her HOW.
She’s an intelligent person, she was just naive about many things and sheltered.
Most kids have been in front of screens for years getting forcefed whatever social engineering drivel got to them first.
This isn’t as asimple as “feminism bad!” or “man bad!” it’s the way our younger generations are being given information and expecting them to not gravitate to the loudest victimhood cause.
It’s on us to fix it.
Yes, I am saying this. She's an adult, but she is not a PR professional. The publicity rollouts for major movies are carefully stage-managed affairs done by people who *are* PR professionals - or at least they were, and should be.
To leave her out there spouting nonsense is inexcusable. I guarantee you she is not the only actor in Hollywood who believes dumb stuff, but you don't normally hear about it during publicity campaigns. Someone needed to have come to Jesus meeting with her: "You go on Graham Norton, you tell a funny story about the shoot, everyone's happy. Just post pictures of the dog on social media. No politics." That's how it's normally done.
She’s an adult. When is maturity expected? Don’t need to be a PR professional to not “spouting nonsense”. Clearly she isn’t the only actor doing so. Gave you another example. But “nonsense” is opposite common sense. And lacking that as an adult allows for “piling on”.
Disney spent millions on Snow White publicity and “leading” actress was still spouting “nonsense”. They feel they can do so now because no longer worried about repercussions.
Mostly, this makes me want to see it more. Im bored of online campaigns to shut down films. Fuck off and get a life.
This only ever happens when women speak.
Then follows the online hate, review bombing, and avoidance at the box office.
Yawn.
If its a good film, I will like it. If its a bad film, I wont.
I dont need a bunch of neckbeards and incels to decide that for me.
Entertainment is a business. It has to make a profit. No one wants to watch movies with queer characters or women heros, in roles that do not reflect reality or biology. That’s why Disney is losing money.
Western Civilization is being dismantled by communists, perverts and Muslims, and if anyone objects they are branded racists or whatever. Or worse, their business or home is burned to the ground or they lose their job or livelihoods.
That is why some people are posting anonymously.
Reality and biology?
Most of the films generating rage are fantasy films. Marvel, Disney etc.
The reality is the world isn't only filled with Cis, white men.
There is plenty of room in TV and film for everyone to see someone they relate to.
You most certainly do not. But your viewpoint and artistic preferences are not the norm. Most people are tired of the political correctness, which is now referred to as DEI and ESG.
If a director wants to make theirown vision of a text, changing minor details, Im all for it. I made this point somewhere else yesterday: I Am Legend was turned into a movie because people loved the novel. But when they ran the test screenings, everyone hated the ending. So they went and reshot it. Now everyone likes it.
Writing for screen is a different medium, with a different audience, and often in a different time period. Audiences have different expectations.
You wanna make Spiderman a 40 year old black woman? Have at it. You want Peter Dinklage to play Jack Reacher? Knock yourself out. You want to make the Passion of the Christ using an animated duck as Jesus? Bravo!
All I ask is you make a good story. That's what matters.
Keep me engaged. Get me emotionally invested. Make me care.
The rest of it is irrelevant. Good stories can survive adaptation and alteration. Not just survive, but thrive.
Anyone who doesnt like it should go write, film, direct their own version. Put your own vision into the world. Restore what you think was missing.
But hiding behind online platforms to abuse people and sabotage the work of artists out their trying to create, that is truly fucking pathetic. They are not upholding important values, they are masking bigotry behind ideology.
She has small oddly shaped boobs. That said, I'm surprised they cast a white girl for the role. I was expecting Supergirl to be BLACK and of course, "stunning and brave."