They had enough female Titans over the year--Starfire, Raven, Donna Troy. (And then there was the whole New 52 era, about which the less said the better.) Technically I think they had Dick Grayson as Robin leading the team most of the time during the Wolfman/Perez and Johns eras everyone remembers, but that's easy enough to change.
The actress looks like a polished-up goblin or half-orc in the glam shot. Unless it was pulled from a candid, that's what the movie team wanted for Supergirl.
If the critics (who tend heavily woke to the point it's a metric you can use to find politically incorrect movies) don't like it, it's probably actually bad.
Interesting to note they've already picked on her to write more superhero movies. You can see if there are enough woke Gen Z fans to make it a commercially successful proposition--or maybe they'll use it as cover to make normie Superman and Batman movies? (And will a general audience that can't tell Marvel from DC want more superhero movies?)
Let it burn, along with every other property which wants to let amateur and uninvested creators cut their teeth on our fandoms without respect for the IP or the fans.
I was ready to see this movie but now it isn't likely going to happen... ever. Besides Mamoa is as overexposed as Ped(r)o Pascal and Alcock wore out her welcome only slightly slower than Rachel Zeigler so I see little/no reason to waste my time.
So do we ignore the marketing spend on these films so they can appear to be successful, or are marketing numbers already included? We need a standard and it shouldn't be "double."
I think it’s pretty cool that an actress with Down syndrome can play super girl in a major studio release! You go Alcock! I Just wish she would have been a person of color as well. Hollywood you’re getting better everyday keep it up!😉
They are required to hire incompetent writers like Ana Nogueira b/c of DEI hiring philosophy which the studios still use even if they claim otherwise. I'm looking forward to watching SUPERGIRL fail epically and ideally take Alcock down with it. She was doing fine with HOUSE OF THE DRAGON but she just couldn't keep that mouth shut when it came to Supergirl and now like others she's going to pay the price for that arrogance and the whole time she'll blame the patriarchy for her failures.
Zero interest in any kind of Gunn movie. Zero interest in the ugly actress playing it or how well she portrays hating men.
Just. Don't. Care.
Same Hollywood turd, different toilet.
My favorite, hands down, is "“How unfortunate.”
Teen Titans will be "female led"? Ugh...
They had enough female Titans over the year--Starfire, Raven, Donna Troy. (And then there was the whole New 52 era, about which the less said the better.) Technically I think they had Dick Grayson as Robin leading the team most of the time during the Wolfman/Perez and Johns eras everyone remembers, but that's easy enough to change.
The actress looks like a polished-up goblin or half-orc in the glam shot. Unless it was pulled from a candid, that's what the movie team wanted for Supergirl.
What a waste.
If the critics (who tend heavily woke to the point it's a metric you can use to find politically incorrect movies) don't like it, it's probably actually bad.
Interesting to note they've already picked on her to write more superhero movies. You can see if there are enough woke Gen Z fans to make it a commercially successful proposition--or maybe they'll use it as cover to make normie Superman and Batman movies? (And will a general audience that can't tell Marvel from DC want more superhero movies?)
Let it burn, along with every other property which wants to let amateur and uninvested creators cut their teeth on our fandoms without respect for the IP or the fans.
I was ready to see this movie but now it isn't likely going to happen... ever. Besides Mamoa is as overexposed as Ped(r)o Pascal and Alcock wore out her welcome only slightly slower than Rachel Zeigler so I see little/no reason to waste my time.
Imcompetence is killing Hollywood. Good riddance.
So do we ignore the marketing spend on these films so they can appear to be successful, or are marketing numbers already included? We need a standard and it shouldn't be "double."
I think it’s pretty cool that an actress with Down syndrome can play super girl in a major studio release! You go Alcock! I Just wish she would have been a person of color as well. Hollywood you’re getting better everyday keep it up!😉
They are required to hire incompetent writers like Ana Nogueira b/c of DEI hiring philosophy which the studios still use even if they claim otherwise. I'm looking forward to watching SUPERGIRL fail epically and ideally take Alcock down with it. She was doing fine with HOUSE OF THE DRAGON but she just couldn't keep that mouth shut when it came to Supergirl and now like others she's going to pay the price for that arrogance and the whole time she'll blame the patriarchy for her failures.
Just saw it with my wife, the marketing is what hurt this movie the most; the movie was actually okay.
Moldy Oldcock is ugly and annoying.
They really push the “mannish” shots of her.