Actress Drew Barrymore known for hosting her own show as well as starring in a number of Hollywood movies such as Charlie’s Angels and Never Been Kissed, claimed that the truth does not exist.This Substack is reader-supported.
She's repeating what (((they've))) told her. This is how almost-sane actors and actresses deal with Luciferian influence: they adopt it, run with it, repeat it. Note: this is the fastest way to "become something" in H-wood.
Refusal is grounds for the termination of a career. When I refused to engage in fellatio as a young boy to a big-name Jewish producer - and offer my rectum for his satisfaction (no, I'm not kidding) - my just-starting career ended within the week.
This is why the progressive victimhood stack exists. Because once you dismantle objective truths and moral principles that have stood the test of time, you are left with a free for all battle royale of ideologies, so you have to now artificially delineate who is most correct based on who has suffered the most. The only way this exists is by emotional blackmail which is entirely subjective, propped up by heated arguments and crumbles by simple logical statements.
She's repeating what (((they've))) told her. This is how almost-sane actors and actresses deal with Luciferian influence: they adopt it, run with it, repeat it. Note: this is the fastest way to "become something" in H-wood.
Refusal is grounds for the termination of a career. When I refused to engage in fellatio as a young boy to a big-name Jewish producer - and offer my rectum for his satisfaction (no, I'm not kidding) - my just-starting career ended within the week.
Good for me.
Not so good for Drew.
what being on steven speilberg's lap as a child does to someone.
Well then, my truth is that objective truth exists.
.
.
.
I win.
This is why the progressive victimhood stack exists. Because once you dismantle objective truths and moral principles that have stood the test of time, you are left with a free for all battle royale of ideologies, so you have to now artificially delineate who is most correct based on who has suffered the most. The only way this exists is by emotional blackmail which is entirely subjective, propped up by heated arguments and crumbles by simple logical statements.
She is very stupid.
That's a relief. For a minute, I thought rape was wrong, but I see now that it was just "his truth."