Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has reversed course on removing sexually explicit books from school libraries after facing intense pressure from author Margaret Atwood and her supporters.
Atwood's trash novel isn't a classic. Hell it's not even vintage.
It was written in 1985. I'm older than that stupid book is, and I didn't even know it existed until all the stupid whores started dressing in the red nun's outfit at demonstrations.
Perhaps I'm asking a bit much from a fellow who believes a freemason ploy from the late 1800's is "historical celtic culture," but I would hate for you to find out what Nuns dress like.
Pretty consistent since 150AD when they were Created, and it doesn't look like a mix of puritains and little house on the prairie. I'm sure even you've seen a Nun before! I Hope at least.
As for the book, the islamic government with freemason aesthetics that is the main villain of that terrible story hates Catholics almost as much as ms atwood and her fans do in Real Life. the story describes the life of an islamic harem girl (mix of sex slave and surrogate, islamic wives actually don't bear children) somewhat accurately in between the weird blaspheming and rape fantasies of the authoress, and the story describes how the government and people of "gilead" take great pleasure in Martyring Catholics and raping Nuns specifically.
you're barking up so many wrong trees here, I have no idea what you are trying to say.
Porn is not just a visual. There are plenty of pornographic novels that DO NOT BELONG in schools. They should never have been there in the first place.
The next time you hear some political pundit talking about how great it would be for Alberta to become the 51st state, understand that what passes for “conservative” in Canada is not necessarily the same as the US. I suspect that Albertan “conservatives” would side with the Democrats on a number of key issues.
The public school libraries should keep classic books. However, this Atwood book sounds like garbage, not one of the classics. It should be banned for being lame.
Atwood's trash novel isn't a classic. Hell it's not even vintage.
It was written in 1985. I'm older than that stupid book is, and I didn't even know it existed until all the stupid whores started dressing in the red nun's outfit at demonstrations.
would be puritain or western us settler, not a Nun.
Why? They are literally dressed up to resemble nuns from the Sisters of Charity of St. Vincent. They don't look like puritans at all.
Perhaps I'm asking a bit much from a fellow who believes a freemason ploy from the late 1800's is "historical celtic culture," but I would hate for you to find out what Nuns dress like.
Pretty consistent since 150AD when they were Created, and it doesn't look like a mix of puritains and little house on the prairie. I'm sure even you've seen a Nun before! I Hope at least.
As for the book, the islamic government with freemason aesthetics that is the main villain of that terrible story hates Catholics almost as much as ms atwood and her fans do in Real Life. the story describes the life of an islamic harem girl (mix of sex slave and surrogate, islamic wives actually don't bear children) somewhat accurately in between the weird blaspheming and rape fantasies of the authoress, and the story describes how the government and people of "gilead" take great pleasure in Martyring Catholics and raping Nuns specifically.
you're barking up so many wrong trees here, I have no idea what you are trying to say.
Worse, I don't think you know either!
Well I never
Carrot top
Mike smith
Nigel peepot
The sex scene in Jaws is tame to the point of being boring. I'm reading for a shark.
Attwood is clawing for relevance, with a book so good that schools must force children to read it.
Make them read Shogun, that's what I did.
shogun is purely satanic. Why are you always like this?
your curses are Consummately Returned!
Let the degenerates have their "literature." If people want to buy a Stephen King "novel" of just page after page of his used toilet tissue, let them.
But school children don't need this. Let them choose their degeneracy later. Forcing it onto them is sick.
Anyone else notice that "classics" do not involve anything older than about 100 years ago?
Porn is not just a visual. There are plenty of pornographic novels that DO NOT BELONG in schools. They should never have been there in the first place.
And Canada thinks they can resist the US. They can’t even resist a female book author!
Canada used to be Bob & Doug McKenezie. Now it’s this.
The next time you hear some political pundit talking about how great it would be for Alberta to become the 51st state, understand that what passes for “conservative” in Canada is not necessarily the same as the US. I suspect that Albertan “conservatives” would side with the Democrats on a number of key issues.
this satanic book is a mix of weird rape fantasies and random blaspheming, this IS "modernity" so it's technically a work of the imperial religion.
atwood's curses are CONSUMMATELY, TOTALLY, COMPLETELY Returned!
nigel peepot
sir, go to hell.
your curses are Consummately Returned!
Margaret Atwood is a communist
The public school libraries should keep classic books. However, this Atwood book sounds like garbage, not one of the classics. It should be banned for being lame.
Since the ladyfolk have attached themselves to this slice of “entertainment”, the happiness quotient seems to have caved to unseen lowness.
Women…..
Women…..