Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffolas's avatar

On the topic of The Orville: it was OK, nothing terrific. Seth McFarlane isn't as funny as he thinks he is. He's not even as funny as his fans think he is either. I can't tolerate most of his work.

The difference with the Orville is, if you squint hard enough, you can see the love this man and this production has for Star Trek. In any other era, it would just be middling fan fiction on its best day.

But we are in an era of franchise vandalism that defies logic and sanity.

This half-baked, lukewarm, so-so funny space show is the absolute best Star Trek product since Enterprise was cancelled 20 some years ago. That's not just sad, it's pathetic.

Mediocrity aside, a huge problem for this show is all the elapsed time. They've done three seasons in nine years. Absolute best case scenario puts it what, two or three years out? Twelve years to make four half seasons of content is laughable. (Remember when shows did 22 episode seasons???)

I skipped season three since it took four years to come out and I wasn't rewatching or recapping it. It wasn't worth the effort then, and won't be going forward if there's more. They had a brief time to capitalize on what they had and missed it. Have more respect for the audience's engagement next time.

William Johnson's avatar

Loved season 1, season 2 was ok, watched only a few episodes of season 3 and will not watch season 4. It went from a love letter to the original Star Trek with a good bit of Galaxy Quest thrown in then degenerated to something as bad as the modern Trek shows. I could care less if season 4 even happens.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?