No different and no less disgusting than when Hollywood was blacklisting people acussed of being Marxist or Communist or Socialist. Yes there was a time when Hollywood was the opposite it is today where it placed an emphasis on pro American cultural types. It was the opposite of woke. Paramount is now owned by Sky Dance who's head is Larry Ellison. You can bet this dedication to blacklisting people who are antisemitic, xenophobic and or homophobic comes from Ellison specifically.
While Ellison isnt Jewish his adoptive parents are and while some will immediately read this the wrong way, it is because of that Jewish influence that he blacklists people who aren't supportive of Isreal, Gays and foreigners. The Jewish community in America consisting of 5 million, have been promoting homosexuality and mass illegal immigration. Not all of course just the ones with billions to influence or shoukd i say ability to purchase politicians. They've been using antisemitism as shaming language for generations to shut down critics of Isreal. There certainly are 100s if millions of Muslims who hate jews and are actual antisemites but just as how racism is used as shaming language as well as to identify actual racists, so to have the Jews and their pro Isreal First supporters used antisemite as a shaming mechanism.
Jews are over representative in Hollywood's higher tiers and whether that's good, bad or indifferent the fact is they are and attempts to mention this can get you labeled an anti smite despite not having indicated if the over representation is bad or not. You could even mention its a good thing and still get called antisemitic and so the real question is why? Why is ine group of people's determined to keep quiet the fact their are this many in decision making roles in this industry as well as any others they are over representative in? Keep in mind over representative doesn't require being a majority. It means that one's groups size relative to the total population is less than there representation in an industry. Usually when one tries to point out this the pushback is that Jews are not the majority ethnicity within the specified industry. Sone say this from ignorance because per capita math and similar ate beyond them while some are just willfully dishonest.
Again, nothing said here as to whether its goid, bad or indifferent only that it is. Ellison like many is allowing his biases to govern his decisions and not the traditional measurements of success. If some popular actor is called an antisemite or homophobic or xenophobic that isnt a reason to blacklist them if working with them is profitable. In so far as any possible replies are along the lines of " what about possible damage to the studios reputation " in say studios have already been doing that for a number of years, they've associated with and promoted actors the majority can't stand and thus the films and series featuring them bomb epically.
We are definitely NOTY THE SAME as I am not monitoring my co-workers sexual preferences as you appear to be; something I find very strange but to each is own I guess.
WTF? Are you OK b/c your text msgs covey the idea that you may be crazy and not politically but literally. You obsess over the sexual preferences of my co-workers (and possible your own) and instead of offering any kind of normal like rebuttal you sling insults. I get the impression you are a woman which would explain the shaming language attempts. If you are then know that men are no longer giving into women's shaming language tactics.
1) A literal description of our respective co-workers.
2) A description of social boundaries: e.g. who one is theoretically willing to work with.
In light of the original posts and comments surrounding cancel culture, and Hollywood's "we don't work with their kind" standards, the latter meaning is most likely.
Notwithstanding that caveat, there is no way internet strangers could write knowledgeably (meaning #1) to make valid claims about their workplaces.
However, this is the realty of clownworld. Should one find oneself in a teaching or medical setting, legal and ethical standards do not allow "live and let live". Mandatory reporters must be watchful for sexual behavior signs pointing to either victims or to perpetrators.
I wish they'd publish the list so I know who to give a follow on X.
Someday maybe they will increase diversity by hiring competent people.
Who am I kidding? No they won’t!
Still prefer Paramount, anyday, over Disney and Warner Bros.
No different and no less disgusting than when Hollywood was blacklisting people acussed of being Marxist or Communist or Socialist. Yes there was a time when Hollywood was the opposite it is today where it placed an emphasis on pro American cultural types. It was the opposite of woke. Paramount is now owned by Sky Dance who's head is Larry Ellison. You can bet this dedication to blacklisting people who are antisemitic, xenophobic and or homophobic comes from Ellison specifically.
While Ellison isnt Jewish his adoptive parents are and while some will immediately read this the wrong way, it is because of that Jewish influence that he blacklists people who aren't supportive of Isreal, Gays and foreigners. The Jewish community in America consisting of 5 million, have been promoting homosexuality and mass illegal immigration. Not all of course just the ones with billions to influence or shoukd i say ability to purchase politicians. They've been using antisemitism as shaming language for generations to shut down critics of Isreal. There certainly are 100s if millions of Muslims who hate jews and are actual antisemites but just as how racism is used as shaming language as well as to identify actual racists, so to have the Jews and their pro Isreal First supporters used antisemite as a shaming mechanism.
Jews are over representative in Hollywood's higher tiers and whether that's good, bad or indifferent the fact is they are and attempts to mention this can get you labeled an anti smite despite not having indicated if the over representation is bad or not. You could even mention its a good thing and still get called antisemitic and so the real question is why? Why is ine group of people's determined to keep quiet the fact their are this many in decision making roles in this industry as well as any others they are over representative in? Keep in mind over representative doesn't require being a majority. It means that one's groups size relative to the total population is less than there representation in an industry. Usually when one tries to point out this the pushback is that Jews are not the majority ethnicity within the specified industry. Sone say this from ignorance because per capita math and similar ate beyond them while some are just willfully dishonest.
Again, nothing said here as to whether its goid, bad or indifferent only that it is. Ellison like many is allowing his biases to govern his decisions and not the traditional measurements of success. If some popular actor is called an antisemite or homophobic or xenophobic that isnt a reason to blacklist them if working with them is profitable. In so far as any possible replies are along the lines of " what about possible damage to the studios reputation " in say studios have already been doing that for a number of years, they've associated with and promoted actors the majority can't stand and thus the films and series featuring them bomb epically.
You don't work with Christians, American patriots, or the sexually normal.
I don't work with genocidal, Christ-hating, degenerates.
We are not the same
We are definitely NOTY THE SAME as I am not monitoring my co-workers sexual preferences as you appear to be; something I find very strange but to each is own I guess.
You've never been a mandatory reporter. Elder abuse, particularly among dementia patients is endemic. Ditto child abuse in Hollywood.
Don't turn a blind eye.
WTF? Are you OK b/c your text msgs covey the idea that you may be crazy and not politically but literally. You obsess over the sexual preferences of my co-workers (and possible your own) and instead of offering any kind of normal like rebuttal you sling insults. I get the impression you are a woman which would explain the shaming language attempts. If you are then know that men are no longer giving into women's shaming language tactics.
Hmmm...
The OG comment rephrases a meme:
https://imgflip.com/i/adkm6c
The parallel construction can mean
1) A literal description of our respective co-workers.
2) A description of social boundaries: e.g. who one is theoretically willing to work with.
In light of the original posts and comments surrounding cancel culture, and Hollywood's "we don't work with their kind" standards, the latter meaning is most likely.
Notwithstanding that caveat, there is no way internet strangers could write knowledgeably (meaning #1) to make valid claims about their workplaces.
However, this is the realty of clownworld. Should one find oneself in a teaching or medical setting, legal and ethical standards do not allow "live and let live". Mandatory reporters must be watchful for sexual behavior signs pointing to either victims or to perpetrators.
I got news for you COdex....... We're ALL not the same. Otherwise we'd be clones and that certainly does not adequately describe humans.
Good luck with your employee sexual monitoring and be sure to stay clear of HR.