Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sara Eson's avatar

I think this critique is missing the level the show is actually operating on.

The “lesbian romance” reading treats a surface detail as the point. It isn’t.

Zosia and Carol’s intimacy isn’t about sexuality. It’s about persuasion, vulnerability and how systems use closeness to dissolve resistance. Calling it “woke romance” flattens the scene’s real function.

Pluribus is quality TV in the classic sense. It rewards viewers who read between the lines. It uses ambiguity as narrative tension, not as filler. What looks “slow” is actually the system tightening - not through force, but through comfort.

That’s what makes it unsettling.

Happy to discuss, but dismissing this as “woke” flattens a much more interesting and much more dangerous

—> idea the show is exploring.

RRocinante's avatar

"We learn almost nothing about the pluribus, why it’s happening, or what Carol can do about it"

I find it ironic you use the royal " We" and don't get it..

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?