Feminist Author Mary Robinette Kowal Takes Heat For Admitting To Using AI To Write Her Latest Novel
Perhaps the biggest possible scandal among the BlueSky crowd is the use of AI. Traditional publishing has worked itself into a frenzy over the technology tool, and people are out looking for, in many cases, literal blood from people who utilize it. Now, Mary Robinette Kowal is under fire after admitting to using the tool in her latest DEI sci-fi screed.
The world first heard of Mary Robinette Kowal as she was brought into Brandon Sanderson’s Writing Excuses podcast as a co-host. The men there wanted to virtue signal by bringing in a female with feminist leanings as a “new perspective” for their audiences. The show’s tone soon changed from fun to something different, but it propelled Mary Robinette Kowal to some prominence in the industry.
Most of Kowal’s work appeared to be romances billed as sci-fi, for which she started winning the award circuit for her outspoken feminism with the John. W Campbell award for best new writer. Her clout in the industry increased, and soon, her award nominations did as well.
Like many writers in the elites, there’s little information on how much she’s sold or what kind of readership she’s cultivated, but a string of award wins and nominations a mile long.
Eventually, she parlayed her awards into a Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association (SFWA) presidency, where she began the decline of the professional organization into the embattled social club it is today.
Mary Robinette Kowal was also brought in to run WorldCon in Washington, D.C., after scandals led prior chairs to step down. The weapons manufacturer Raytheon sponsored the convention, and the sci-fi fandom quickly chastised the convention, and she was forced to apologize for it.
She also had a history of attacking conservatives in science fiction. She used her blog and clout to attack authors who organized the Sad Puppies slate of nominees in the Hugo Awards. “Historically, every time there’s an advance in the rights of a disenfranchised group, whether that’s women’s lib or desegregation, there’s a corresponding pushback by the dominant group because it feels like it is losing power,” she wrote at the time on her blog while attacking Baen Books writer Larry Correia and his friends in the industry.
Her Lady Astronaut series is a hallmark of her feminism and her push to move science fiction away from being little more than romance novels in a space setting, with many critics describing her plots as not much happening at all outside of the intrapersonal moments and explicit sex scenes, which earn Kowal award nominations. The most recent book, The Martian Contingency, advocated for the murder of babies within the book, which was cheered on by the publishing elite.
Unfortunately, they didn’t realize she used the dreaded AI.
Authors have been reacting to SFWA changing their rules for the Nebula Awards regarding AI, and Mary Robinette Kowal admitted her use of it on BlueSky in response to it.
One wonders how much AI she utilized in the book with this, pardon the pun, nebulous statement. However, one can make an educated deduction from SFWA’s now removed rules that she wrote something using generative large language models in the book and it wasn’t just something used to hunt typos:
Apparently, the backlash was so bad that she received death threats for posting about it:
Fan reaction continued to pour on in opposition to Mary Robinette Kowal on BlueSky afterward:
It appears that no matter who much SJW virtue signaling Mary Robinette Kowal does, AI use in any form is simply too far for the mob of her audience.
What do you think of this AI news?
For a great alternative to mainstream publishing, with sci-fi spy thriller action, read The Stars Entwined on Amazon!
NEXT: Ark Press Fires Larry Correia’s Friend And Senior Editor, DJ Butler











Let me give her a little credit. Her lecture on writing short stories is really good. I started writing short stories after that lecture. Now, there is a small thing that I think she missed (the impactful and a little unpredictable ending is a must for me), but everything else is solid. After that lecture I did notice that my natural scene lengths is around 750 words, which helped with the pacing.
Now, that book and the “allegations”. BlueSky crowd is incapable of noticing nuance - like, they will throw a tantrum over using AI for spelling or punctuation checks, and that crowd is unforgiving to anyone who strays away from the mainline.
And of course - they can’t commit to their insane behavior, so they change the rules. Again.
PS I’ve made multiple tests of the quality of AI writing, and it’s always lackluster. Makes you wonder - if a books is better with AI generated paragraphs (as we speculate here), then how meh would it be without it? It is possible to write worse than AI, you know.
She just Lady Astronaut nuked herself from orbit lol. Burn baby burn.