Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AJ's avatar

What do I think? I think you guys spilled thousands of words telling us why we can't trust Sanderson, and now you're promoting his views for the second time in a week. Care to tell us what's changed? Did he win a PR war against this website, or Mr. del Arroz? Did he apologize behind the scenes? Is some kind of back room deal in the offing?

Mr. Trent acknowledged in the previous article that he shouldn't have written about Sanderson without at least referencing his past trustworthiness issues. Will there be a similar excuse here -- and will it be taken seriously this time -- or will you simply delete this comment?

No posts

Ready for more?